Smørfugl Smørfugl, smoerfugl.dk

Cursor Agent: From Pair Programmer to Autonomous Builder

Cursor Agent: From Pair Programmer to Autonomous Builder

Over the past year, “AI coding assistants” graduated from autocomplete toys to serious teammates. The Cursor Agent pushes this further: it is not just a suggestor in your editor, it is a goal-driven collaborator that can search your codebase, plan, edit, run commands, and ship changes end-to-end. Used well, it turns hours of repetitive engineering into minutes—without trading away quality.

This post explains how I use Cursor Agent effectively: where it shines, what to watch out for, and a concise playbook to get real work done with it today.

What is Cursor Agent?

Cursor Agent is an autonomous workflow mode inside the Cursor editor. Instead of prompting for a single snippet, you give it a concrete objective (for example: “implement a health check endpoint”, “add a blog post”, or “migrate from Jest to Vitest”). The agent then:

  • Plans the steps
  • Searches and reads relevant files
  • Applies edits across the codebase
  • Runs short commands (tests, linters, builds)
  • Iterates until the goal is satisfied

The core shift: you describe outcomes; the agent handles the mechanics.

Where it excels

  • Large refactors: Rename symbols, update imports, and rewrite call sites consistently.
  • Framework migrations: Swap test runners, CSS toolchains, or routing libraries by following a plan.
  • Feature scaffolding: Create routes, handlers, DTOs, and tests connected end-to-end.
  • Repository chores: Lint fixes, dependency bumps, CI tweaks, doc generation.

In all of these, the agent’s strength is orchestration: it can synchronize many small, correct edits faster than a human.

Guardrails that matter

Autonomy is powerful but needs constraints. These practices keep results reliable:

  • State the goal crisply: Include acceptance criteria, affected folders, and constraints (e.g., “don’t change public APIs”).
  • Favor read-first: Ask it to scan with ripgrep-like search and read key files before editing.

  • Short-lived commands only: Builds, tests, and formatters are perfect; avoid long-running daemons.

  • Verify diffs: Ask for a summary of edits and review the unified diff before committing.
  • Keep commits scoped: One logical change per PR improves review and rollback.

A pragmatic workflow

  1. Set the goal: “Add X with Y behavior; done when tests pass and docs updated.”
  2. Context seed: Point to core files (entrypoints, config, key modules). Mention non-obvious constraints.
  3. Ask for a plan: “Propose a plan; confirm before editing.” Skim it for sanity.
  4. Let it execute: Allow it to search, edit, and run fast checks.
  5. Review + refine: Request a diff summary, skim hot spots, and iterate.
  6. Finish: Have it run the test/build, write a short changelog, and prepare a PR description.

Tips that compound

  • Name things clearly: The agent mirrors your naming. Good names improve downstream edits.
  • Prefer explicit interfaces: Clear types and boundaries reduce hallucinated glue code.
  • Keep scripts canonical: A single test/build/lint entry makes automation robust.
  • Teach the repo: A short CONTRIBUTING.md with run commands and conventions boosts accuracy.

Common pitfalls and fixes

  • Endless changes: Add acceptance criteria and a stop condition (e.g., “no API changes”).
  • Tooling drift: Pin formatter and linter versions; disagreeing tools cause noisy diffs.
  • Partial refactors: Ask it to run code search after edits to catch stragglers.
  • Hidden coupling: Request a repo-wide type check or quick build to surface integration errors.

Getting started quickly

  • Install Cursor and enable the Agent.
  • Expose project scripts: build, test, lint, format.
  • Start with low-risk tasks: docs, scripts, and small features.
  • Grow ambition as you build trust in the loop.

Final thought

Cursor Agent is not a replacement for engineering judgment. It’s a force multiplier for it. By delegating mechanics and repetition, you can focus on architecture, correctness, and the business outcomes that matter.

Used intentionally—with good goals, guardrails, and review discipline—it turns the editor into an execution environment, and your ideas into shipped software faster than ever.